cost
Cost of Living Index
Zhangjiakou106.4 / 0
London87.2 / 100
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: London leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; London leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; London leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; London leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Zhangjiakou | 106.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | London | 87.2 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Zhangjiakou | 50.8 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | London | 67.1 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Zhangjiakou | $1,510 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | London | $1,492 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Zhangjiakou | 11.2x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | London | 10.6x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Zhangjiakou | $1,565/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | London | $2,509/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Zhangjiakou | 6.9% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | London | 4.8% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Zhangjiakou | 58.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | London | 66.2 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Zhangjiakou | 73.7 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | London | 78.5 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
London wins on 16 of 22 metrics compared to Zhangjiakou.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Zhangjiakou leads environment, connectivity, and health; London leads cost, safety, and rent.
cost
Zhangjiakou
106.4
London
87.2
safety
Zhangjiakou
50.8
London
67.1
housing
Zhangjiakou
$1,510
London
$1,492
housing
Zhangjiakou
11.2x
London
10.6x
jobs
Zhangjiakou
$1,565/mo
London
$2,509/mo
jobs
Zhangjiakou
6.9%
London
4.8%
health
Zhangjiakou
58.9
London
66.2
health
Zhangjiakou
73.7 years
London
78.5 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Zhangjiakou
-0.6%
London
2.1%
education
Zhangjiakou
55
London
72.2
transport
Zhangjiakou
63.6
London
66.5
safety
Zhangjiakou
25.6 per 100k
London
11.6 per 100k
safety
Zhangjiakou
33.0 per 100k
London
26.7 per 100k
health
Zhangjiakou
21.0%
London
28.1%
quality
Zhangjiakou
6
London
5.6
housing
Zhangjiakou
$3,091/sqm
London
$12,404/sqm
religion
Zhangjiakou
43.9%
London
71.5%
religion
Zhangjiakou
69.1%
London
70.9%
religion
Zhangjiakou
59.3%
London
54.3%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.