cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Ulaanbaatar leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Quzhou leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Quzhou leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Quzhou leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Quzhou | 81.8 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Ulaanbaatar | 69.4 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Quzhou | 55 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Ulaanbaatar | 42.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Quzhou | $1,941 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Ulaanbaatar | $1,974 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Quzhou | 10.1x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Ulaanbaatar | 11.6x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Quzhou | $3,211/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Ulaanbaatar | $3,374/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Quzhou | 11.3% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Ulaanbaatar | 6.2% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Quzhou | 64.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Ulaanbaatar | 85.9 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Quzhou | 80.5 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Ulaanbaatar | 69.4 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Quzhou wins on 13 of 22 metrics compared to Ulaanbaatar.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Quzhou leads safety, rent, and housing; Ulaanbaatar leads cost, salary, and jobs.
cost
Quzhou
81.8
Ulaanbaatar
69.4
safety
Quzhou
55
Ulaanbaatar
42.4
housing
Quzhou
$1,941
Ulaanbaatar
$1,974
housing
Quzhou
10.1x
Ulaanbaatar
11.6x
jobs
Quzhou
$3,211/mo
Ulaanbaatar
$3,374/mo
jobs
Quzhou
11.3%
Ulaanbaatar
6.2%
health
Quzhou
64.9
Ulaanbaatar
85.9
health
Quzhou
80.5 years
Ulaanbaatar
69.4 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Quzhou
0.5%
Ulaanbaatar
2.7%
education
Quzhou
71
Ulaanbaatar
47.5
transport
Quzhou
82.8
Ulaanbaatar
54.6
safety
Quzhou
27.1 per 100k
Ulaanbaatar
4.2 per 100k
safety
Quzhou
52.5 per 100k
Ulaanbaatar
57.0 per 100k
health
Quzhou
11.6%
Ulaanbaatar
10.9%
quality
Quzhou
4.9
Ulaanbaatar
3.7
housing
Quzhou
$8,879/sqm
Ulaanbaatar
$10,293/sqm
religion
Quzhou
72.5%
Ulaanbaatar
70.7%
religion
Quzhou
80.9%
Ulaanbaatar
27.5%
religion
Quzhou
62.9%
Ulaanbaatar
58.1%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.