cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Guangzhou leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Pingxiang leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Pingxiang leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Pingxiang leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Pingxiang | 80.1 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Guangzhou | 79.4 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Pingxiang | 50.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Guangzhou | 46.1 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Pingxiang | $1,572 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Guangzhou | $2,436 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Pingxiang | 9.0x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Guangzhou | 9.1x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Pingxiang | $3,066/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Guangzhou | $1,903/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Pingxiang | 7.2% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Guangzhou | 5.5% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Pingxiang | 67.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Guangzhou | 74 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Pingxiang | 74.9 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Guangzhou | 78.6 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Pingxiang wins on 12 of 22 metrics compared to Guangzhou.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Pingxiang leads safety, rent, and housing; Guangzhou leads cost, jobs, and health.
cost
Pingxiang
80.1
Guangzhou
79.4
safety
Pingxiang
50.7
Guangzhou
46.1
housing
Pingxiang
$1,572
Guangzhou
$2,436
housing
Pingxiang
9.0x
Guangzhou
9.1x
jobs
Pingxiang
$3,066/mo
Guangzhou
$1,903/mo
jobs
Pingxiang
7.2%
Guangzhou
5.5%
health
Pingxiang
67.9
Guangzhou
74
health
Pingxiang
74.9 years
Guangzhou
78.6 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Pingxiang
2.4%
Guangzhou
1.9%
education
Pingxiang
69.8
Guangzhou
58.5
transport
Pingxiang
81.5
Guangzhou
67.7
safety
Pingxiang
27.6 per 100k
Guangzhou
29.4 per 100k
safety
Pingxiang
43.2 per 100k
Guangzhou
16.6 per 100k
health
Pingxiang
21.7%
Guangzhou
11.5%
quality
Pingxiang
6.4
Guangzhou
5.2
housing
Pingxiang
$6,039/sqm
Guangzhou
$3,848/sqm
religion
Pingxiang
45.8%
Guangzhou
72.1%
religion
Pingxiang
86.9%
Guangzhou
46.6%
religion
Pingxiang
64.1%
Guangzhou
68.8%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.