cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Ulaanbaatar leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Okayama leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Ulaanbaatar leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Ulaanbaatar leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Okayama | 90.7 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Ulaanbaatar | 69.4 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Okayama | 71.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Ulaanbaatar | 42.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Okayama | $2,630 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Ulaanbaatar | $1,974 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Okayama | 13.3x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Ulaanbaatar | 11.6x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Okayama | $5,205/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Ulaanbaatar | $3,374/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Okayama | 7.3% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Ulaanbaatar | 6.2% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Okayama | 67.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Ulaanbaatar | 85.9 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Okayama | 84.0 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Ulaanbaatar | 69.4 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Ulaanbaatar wins on 13 of 22 metrics compared to Okayama.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Okayama leads safety, salary, and health; Ulaanbaatar leads cost, rent, and housing.
cost
Okayama
90.7
Ulaanbaatar
69.4
safety
Okayama
71.7
Ulaanbaatar
42.4
housing
Okayama
$2,630
Ulaanbaatar
$1,974
housing
Okayama
13.3x
Ulaanbaatar
11.6x
jobs
Okayama
$5,205/mo
Ulaanbaatar
$3,374/mo
jobs
Okayama
7.3%
Ulaanbaatar
6.2%
health
Okayama
67.9
Ulaanbaatar
85.9
health
Okayama
84.0 years
Ulaanbaatar
69.4 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Okayama
1.0%
Ulaanbaatar
2.7%
education
Okayama
60.6
Ulaanbaatar
47.5
transport
Okayama
93.6
Ulaanbaatar
54.6
safety
Okayama
15.0 per 100k
Ulaanbaatar
4.2 per 100k
safety
Okayama
74.4 per 100k
Ulaanbaatar
57.0 per 100k
health
Okayama
18.8%
Ulaanbaatar
10.9%
quality
Okayama
3.8
Ulaanbaatar
3.7
housing
Okayama
$6,894/sqm
Ulaanbaatar
$10,293/sqm
religion
Okayama
38.4%
Ulaanbaatar
70.7%
religion
Okayama
58.6%
Ulaanbaatar
27.5%
religion
Okayama
32.8%
Ulaanbaatar
58.1%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.