cost
Cost of Living Index
Liaoyang90.9 / 0
London87.2 / 100
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: London leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; London leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; London leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Liaoyang leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Liaoyang | 90.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | London | 87.2 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Liaoyang | 45.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | London | 67.1 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Liaoyang | $2,319 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | London | $1,492 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Liaoyang | 5.4x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | London | 10.6x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Liaoyang | $2,869/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | London | $2,509/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Liaoyang | 10.7% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | London | 4.8% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Liaoyang | 67.1 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | London | 66.2 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Liaoyang | 71.5 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | London | 78.5 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
No clear winner across 22 metrics.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Liaoyang leads housing, salary, and health; London leads cost, safety, and rent.
cost
Liaoyang
90.9
London
87.2
safety
Liaoyang
45.4
London
67.1
housing
Liaoyang
$2,319
London
$1,492
housing
Liaoyang
5.4x
London
10.6x
jobs
Liaoyang
$2,869/mo
London
$2,509/mo
jobs
Liaoyang
10.7%
London
4.8%
health
Liaoyang
67.1
London
66.2
health
Liaoyang
71.5 years
London
78.5 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Liaoyang
0.9%
London
2.1%
education
Liaoyang
79
London
72.2
transport
Liaoyang
59.4
London
66.5
safety
Liaoyang
23.5 per 100k
London
11.6 per 100k
safety
Liaoyang
46.0 per 100k
London
26.7 per 100k
health
Liaoyang
10.0%
London
28.1%
quality
Liaoyang
6.3
London
5.6
housing
Liaoyang
$4,987/sqm
London
$12,404/sqm
religion
Liaoyang
68.5%
London
71.5%
religion
Liaoyang
85.3%
London
70.9%
religion
Liaoyang
53.9%
London
54.3%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.