cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Chongqing leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Chongqing leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Chongqing leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Liaoyang leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Liaoyang | 90.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Chongqing | 81.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Liaoyang | 45.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Chongqing | 46.4 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Liaoyang | $2,319 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Chongqing | $2,305 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Liaoyang | 5.4x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Chongqing | 6.4x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Liaoyang | $2,869/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Chongqing | $3,196/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Liaoyang | 10.7% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Chongqing | 4.9% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Liaoyang | 67.1 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Chongqing | 60.8 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Liaoyang | 71.5 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Chongqing | 79.2 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
No clear winner across 22 metrics.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Liaoyang leads housing, health, and air quality; Chongqing leads cost, safety, and rent.
cost
Liaoyang
90.9
Chongqing
81.7
safety
Liaoyang
45.4
Chongqing
46.4
housing
Liaoyang
$2,319
Chongqing
$2,305
housing
Liaoyang
5.4x
Chongqing
6.4x
jobs
Liaoyang
$2,869/mo
Chongqing
$3,196/mo
jobs
Liaoyang
10.7%
Chongqing
4.9%
health
Liaoyang
67.1
Chongqing
60.8
health
Liaoyang
71.5 years
Chongqing
79.2 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Liaoyang
0.9%
Chongqing
1.5%
education
Liaoyang
79
Chongqing
59.4
transport
Liaoyang
59.4
Chongqing
59.1
safety
Liaoyang
23.5 per 100k
Chongqing
27.5 per 100k
safety
Liaoyang
46.0 per 100k
Chongqing
33.1 per 100k
health
Liaoyang
10.0%
Chongqing
16.0%
quality
Liaoyang
6.3
Chongqing
4.5
housing
Liaoyang
$4,987/sqm
Chongqing
$5,381/sqm
religion
Liaoyang
68.5%
Chongqing
31.3%
religion
Liaoyang
85.3%
Chongqing
72.8%
religion
Liaoyang
53.9%
Chongqing
64.0%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.