cost
Cost of Living Index
Kagoshima95.3 / 0
Doha75.7 / 100
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Doha leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Doha leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Doha leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Doha leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Kagoshima | 95.3 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Doha | 75.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Kagoshima | 59.9 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Doha | 69.3 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Kagoshima | $2,478 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Doha | $1,600 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Kagoshima | 10.2x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Doha | 6.9x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Kagoshima | $1,872/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Doha | $5,008/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Kagoshima | 6.5% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Doha | 8.1% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Kagoshima | 80.3 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Doha | 91.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Kagoshima | 74.3 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Doha | 73.7 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Doha wins on 16 of 22 metrics compared to Kagoshima.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Kagoshima leads jobs, health, and connectivity; Doha leads cost, safety, and rent.
cost
Kagoshima
95.3
Doha
75.7
safety
Kagoshima
59.9
Doha
69.3
housing
Kagoshima
$2,478
Doha
$1,600
housing
Kagoshima
10.2x
Doha
6.9x
jobs
Kagoshima
$1,872/mo
Doha
$5,008/mo
jobs
Kagoshima
6.5%
Doha
8.1%
health
Kagoshima
80.3
Doha
91.7
health
Kagoshima
74.3 years
Doha
73.7 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Kagoshima
0.9%
Doha
5.9%
education
Kagoshima
62.6
Doha
80.6
transport
Kagoshima
63
Doha
84.5
safety
Kagoshima
22.9 per 100k
Doha
16.5 per 100k
safety
Kagoshima
71.9 per 100k
Doha
60.4 per 100k
health
Kagoshima
23.1%
Doha
27.1%
quality
Kagoshima
5
Doha
5.1
housing
Kagoshima
$6,668/sqm
Doha
$6,001/sqm
religion
Kagoshima
49.2%
Doha
59.3%
religion
Kagoshima
46.4%
Doha
39.0%
religion
Kagoshima
52.5%
Doha
36.5%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.