cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Chongqing leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Guigang leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Guigang leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Chongqing leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Guigang | 104.8 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Chongqing | 81.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Guigang | 56.8 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Chongqing | 46.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Guigang | $2,055 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Chongqing | $2,305 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Guigang | 7.3x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Chongqing | 6.4x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Guigang | $4,051/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Chongqing | $3,196/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Guigang | 3.8% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Chongqing | 4.9% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Guigang | 59.2 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Chongqing | 60.8 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Guigang | 74.0 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Chongqing | 79.2 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Chongqing wins on 12 of 22 metrics compared to Guigang.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Guigang leads safety, rent, and salary; Chongqing leads cost, housing, and health.
cost
Guigang
104.8
Chongqing
81.7
safety
Guigang
56.8
Chongqing
46.4
housing
Guigang
$2,055
Chongqing
$2,305
housing
Guigang
7.3x
Chongqing
6.4x
jobs
Guigang
$4,051/mo
Chongqing
$3,196/mo
jobs
Guigang
3.8%
Chongqing
4.9%
health
Guigang
59.2
Chongqing
60.8
health
Guigang
74.0 years
Chongqing
79.2 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Guigang
0.0%
Chongqing
1.5%
education
Guigang
55.3
Chongqing
59.4
transport
Guigang
64
Chongqing
59.1
safety
Guigang
27.9 per 100k
Chongqing
27.5 per 100k
safety
Guigang
49.9 per 100k
Chongqing
33.1 per 100k
health
Guigang
13.0%
Chongqing
16.0%
quality
Guigang
7
Chongqing
4.5
housing
Guigang
$6,815/sqm
Chongqing
$5,381/sqm
religion
Guigang
76.0%
Chongqing
31.3%
religion
Guigang
69.8%
Chongqing
72.8%
religion
Guigang
64.9%
Chongqing
64.0%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.