cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Guangzhou leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Guangzhou leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Guangzhou leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Daqing leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Daqing | 113.3 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Guangzhou | 79.4 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Daqing | 39.2 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Guangzhou | 46.1 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Daqing | $2,618 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Guangzhou | $2,436 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Daqing | 6.4x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Guangzhou | 9.1x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Daqing | $1,048/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Guangzhou | $1,903/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Daqing | 4.0% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Guangzhou | 5.5% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Daqing | 72.5 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Guangzhou | 74 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Daqing | 76.7 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Guangzhou | 78.6 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Guangzhou wins on 13 of 22 metrics compared to Daqing.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Daqing leads housing, jobs, and air quality; Guangzhou leads cost, safety, and rent.
cost
Daqing
113.3
Guangzhou
79.4
safety
Daqing
39.2
Guangzhou
46.1
housing
Daqing
$2,618
Guangzhou
$2,436
housing
Daqing
6.4x
Guangzhou
9.1x
jobs
Daqing
$1,048/mo
Guangzhou
$1,903/mo
jobs
Daqing
4.0%
Guangzhou
5.5%
health
Daqing
72.5
Guangzhou
74
health
Daqing
76.7 years
Guangzhou
78.6 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Daqing
-0.1%
Guangzhou
1.9%
education
Daqing
72.5
Guangzhou
58.5
transport
Daqing
84.6
Guangzhou
67.7
safety
Daqing
28.5 per 100k
Guangzhou
29.4 per 100k
safety
Daqing
39.4 per 100k
Guangzhou
16.6 per 100k
health
Daqing
13.7%
Guangzhou
11.5%
quality
Daqing
6.9
Guangzhou
5.2
housing
Daqing
$10,668/sqm
Guangzhou
$3,848/sqm
religion
Daqing
77.6%
Guangzhou
72.1%
religion
Daqing
43.8%
Guangzhou
46.6%
religion
Daqing
51.1%
Guangzhou
68.8%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.