cost
Comparison
Side-by-side data for relocation, travel, hiring, and investment decisions. Values are shown with source-backed metric definitions so trade-offs are easy to compare.
Bars and radar use 0-100 better scores. Tooltips keep the raw source values visible.
Chart summary: Chongqing leads Cost of Living Index with 100 out of 100; Chizhou leads Safety Index with 100 out of 100; Chongqing leads Median Monthly Rent with 100 out of 100; Chongqing leads House Price to Income with 100 out of 100. A complete normalized score table follows.
| Metric | Place | Raw value | Normalized score | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Index | Chizhou | 116.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Cost of Living Index | Chongqing | 81.7 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Safety Index | Chizhou | 49.1 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Safety Index | Chongqing | 46.4 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | UNData / UNSD |
| Median Monthly Rent | Chizhou | $2,422 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Median Monthly Rent | Chongqing | $2,305 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Chizhou | 6.7x | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| House Price to Income | Chongqing | 6.4x | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Chizhou | $1,308/mo | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Average Salary | Chongqing | $3,196/mo | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Chizhou | 5.5% | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Unemployment Rate | Chongqing | 4.9% | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | World Bank Open Data |
| Healthcare Access Index | Chizhou | 72.9 | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Healthcare Access Index | Chongqing | 60.8 | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Chizhou | 75.0 years | 0 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
| Life Expectancy | Chongqing | 79.2 years | 100 out of 100 | 2026 | WHO Global Health Observatory |
cost
safety
housing
housing
jobs
jobs
health
health
Winner
Chizhou wins on 12 of 22 metrics compared to Chongqing.
Winner logic counts row wins after applying each metric direction. Exact ties do not count. Methodology
Top trade-offs
Chizhou leads safety, health, and air quality; Chongqing leads cost, rent, and housing.
cost
Chizhou
116.4
Chongqing
81.7
safety
Chizhou
49.1
Chongqing
46.4
housing
Chizhou
$2,422
Chongqing
$2,305
housing
Chizhou
6.7x
Chongqing
6.4x
jobs
Chizhou
$1,308/mo
Chongqing
$3,196/mo
jobs
Chizhou
5.5%
Chongqing
4.9%
health
Chizhou
72.9
Chongqing
60.8
health
Chizhou
75.0 years
Chongqing
79.2 years
environment
environment
infrastructure
demographics
Chizhou
2.0%
Chongqing
1.5%
education
Chizhou
66.8
Chongqing
59.4
transport
Chizhou
77.8
Chongqing
59.1
safety
Chizhou
22.9 per 100k
Chongqing
27.5 per 100k
safety
Chizhou
31.6 per 100k
Chongqing
33.1 per 100k
health
Chizhou
17.4%
Chongqing
16.0%
quality
Chizhou
7.3
Chongqing
4.5
housing
Chizhou
$3,926/sqm
Chongqing
$5,381/sqm
religion
Chizhou
34.9%
Chongqing
31.3%
religion
Chizhou
44.5%
Chongqing
72.8%
religion
Chizhou
52.5%
Chongqing
64.0%
Some city-level values are modeled estimates when official city-level data is unavailable.
Each metric keeps its source, year, last refreshed date, and confidence label visible. Review methodology or Data Sources.